Initiatives and Referenda Withdrawn or Failed to Qualify

This page contains a list of proposed initiative and referendum measures that during the last 60 days have been withdrawn by proponents or have failed to gather the required number of signatures during the circulation period. 

 

1831. (17-0034)
Requires That Proceeds of Bonds or Taxes Approved by the Voters Be Spent on the Specific Projects or Uses Approved by the Voters. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 12/04/17
Failed: 08/08/18
Signatures Required: 585,407
Proponents: Michael S. Warda c/o Dave Gilliard or Natalie Blanning (916) 626-6804 info@gbacampaigns.com

Prohibits state and local governments and special districts from spending proceeds of bonds or taxes approved by the voters for any purposes other than those provided in the measure authorizing those bonds or taxes. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Potentially less state and local fiscal flexibility over the use of bond proceeds and tax revenue, depending upon future decisions made by elected officials, the courts, and the voters. (17-0034.)

1838. (17-0042, Amdt.#1)
Establishes New Standards for Confinement of Certain Farm Animals; Bans Sale of Certain Non-Complying Products. Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 12/29/17
Failed: 08/01/18
Signatures Required: 365,880

Proponents: Debra Jane Murdock (916) 441-1064

Establishes new minimum space requirements for confining veal calves, breeding pigs, and egg-laying hens; requires egg-laying hens be raised in cage-free environment after December 31, 2023. Prohibits certain commercial sales of specified meat and egg products from animals confined in non-complying manner. Defines sales violations as unfair competition. Creates good faith defense for sellers relying upon written certification by suppliers that meat or animal products comply with new confinement standards. Requires State of California to issue implementing regulations. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Potential decrease in state and local tax revenues from farm businesses, likely not to exceed the low millions of dollars annually. Potential state costs ranging up to ten million dollars annually to enforce the measure. (17-0042.)

1842. (17-0046, Amdt.#1)
Amends Three Strikes Sentencing Law for Repeat Offenders. Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 01/17/18
Failed: 08/08/18
Signatures Required: 365,880
Proponents: Thomas R. Loversky (888) 245-9393

Revises the three strikes law to impose a life sentence with possibility of parole only when the third or subsequent conviction is for a violent felony, unless the new offense is a specified sex- or firearm-related crime, or a prior offense was for rape, child molestation, or murder. Requires resentencing of inmates currently serving life with possible parole if they would have received different sentences under this measure. Applies savings to schools, colleges, prison rehabilitation programs, and youth crime prevention programs. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Net state criminal justice system savings that would likely be in the high tens of millions of dollars initially and could eventually exceed $100 million annually. State savings from the measure would be spent on education, inmate rehabilitation, and youth crime prevention programs. Increased county costs that could exceed $10 million annually, primarily due to increased county community supervision populations. (17-0046.)

1843. (17-0047, Amdt.#1)
Increases Funding for Hospitals, Clinics, and Primary Care Providers Serving Low-Income Patients by Increasing Tax on Personal Income Over $1 Million. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 01/18/18
Failed: 08/08/18
Signatures Required: 585,407 - (25% of Signatures Reached 04/20/2018 (PDF))
Proponents: Michael Borges and Benjamin Tracey c/o Catha Worthman and Darin Ranahan (510) 269-7998 catha@feinbergjackson.com darin@feinbergjackson.com

Increases funding for: (1) eligible hospitals, clinics, and primary healthcare providers that serve low-income patients and medically underserved communities; and (2) educating and training certain healthcare workers. Provides dedicated revenue for this funding and program administration by taxing personal income over $1 million an additional 1%. Requires annual audit to verify funds are properly spent. Requires Attorney General or district attorneys to investigate misuse of funds. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Additional state revenues typically between $1.5 billion and $2.5 billion annually, depending on the economy and asset markets. This funding is allocated to safety net hospitals (70 percent), community health clinics (25 percent), and health care workforce development and training projects (5 percent) eligible for funding under the initiative. (17-0047.)

1847. (17-0051, Amdt.#1)
Expands Requirement for Supermajority Approval to Enact New Local Government Revenue Measures. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 01/26/18
Failed: 08/23/18
Signatures Required: 585,407
Proponents: Robert Lapsley c/o Kurt Oneto (916) 446-6752

For local governments, requires two-thirds approval of electorate to raise new taxes or governing body to raise new fees. Requires that local laws enacting new taxes specify how revenues can be spent. Heightens legal threshold for local governments to prove that fees passed without two-thirds voter approval are not taxes. Invalidates local taxes imposed in 2018, unless taxes meet criteria adopted by this measure. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Potentially substantial decrease in annual local revenues, depending upon future actions of local governing bodies, voters, and the courts. (17-0051.)

1848. (17-0052, Amdt.#1)
Regulates Various Substances and Practices Related to Agriculture, Consumer Products, and Health. Initiative Statute.

Summary Date: 02/07/18 
Failed: 08/29/18
Signatures Required: 365,880
Proponents: Cheriel Jensen (408) 379-0463 cherielj@earthlink.net 

Prohibits genetically engineered plants and animals and over 300 listed substances from being used or released into the environment. Creates new state entity to regulate environmental activities, modify projects having pollution and radiation impacts, and test and approve substances before they can be introduced in California. Prohibits treatment of water with fluoride or chlorine. Regulates vaccine ingredients and eliminates vaccination as a prerequisite for attendance at schools and daycare facilities. Provides criminal and civil liability for violations, with no statute of limitations. Fiscal impact: It is the opinion of the Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance that the measure would result in a substantial net change in state and local finances. (17-0052.)

1849. (17-0053)
Increases the Number of Candidates in General Elections for State and Congressional Offices. Initiative Constitutional Amendment.
Summary Date: 02/14/18 
Failed: 08/29/18
Signatures Required: 585,407
Proponents: Richard Charles Ginnaty (714) 771-1720

Increases the number of candidates that advance from a primary election to a general election, from the top two candidates to the top four candidates, regardless of party affiliation. Applies to congressional, state legislative, and most statewide offices. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Increased state and local elections costs potentially totaling in the millions of dollars for every two-year election cycle. (17-0053.)

1850. (17-0054)
Allows for Jury Trials in Child-Custody and Dependent-Child Determinations. Initiative Statute.
Summary Date: 02/20/18 
Failed: 08/29/18
Signatures Required: 365,880
Proponents:
Stephen Konnoff and 18 others (916) 508-8047

Gives parties in child-custody matters the right to demand that a jury, rather than a judge, determine who receives the physical and legal custody of the child. Prohibits the judge from rejecting a jury’s joint-child-custody decision. Provides that findings in dependent-child proceedings, in which a juvenile may be declared a dependent of the court, can be made by a judge or jury. Summary of estimate by Legislative Analyst and Director of Finance of fiscal impact on state and local government: Unknown ongoing net fiscal impact on state courts that would depend significantly on (1) how the measure is interpreted and implemented by the courts and (2) how individuals respond to the ability to demand a jury trial in child custody and juvenile dependency jurisdictional hearings. Potential ongoing increase in county costs that could reach the low millions of dollars annually related to juvenile dependency jurisdictional cases—some or all of which could be shifted to the state. (17-0054.)