The Secretary of State, through the State Archives, has the authority to identify and retain those records "deem[ed] to be of historical value” (Government Code Section 12224). Further, "No record shall be destroyed or otherwise disposed of by any agency of the state unless it is determined by the director [of General Services] that the record has no further administrative, legal, or fiscal value and the Secretary of State has determined that the record is inappropriate for preservation in the State Archives“ (Government Code Section 14755).
Whether the Archives keeps a particular record series is determined through the process of appraisal. There are several steps in the appraisal process:
Some series descriptions found on retention schedules do a poor job of describing the records, so we may flag something that *reads* great on a schedule, but (after being physically appraised) may be unworthy of archival retention. And vice-versa: the records may not be flagged, but should be retained
So how do we decide what to keep? As professional archivists, we are trained to appraise records by looking at several different values. These values fall into two categories: primary and secondary. Primary values may be administrative, legal, or fiscal. Generally speaking, primary values become less important as time passes, although this is not always the case. Records with still important primary values are usually still active and have not yet reached the end of their approved retention periods.
Secondary values include evidential and informational values -- these two values are the principal concerns of archivists. Evidential values are those used to "determine the organizational structure of an institution, document its procedures, policies and activities, and evaluate its effectiveness." Informational value is placed on those records that have information about "persons, places, subjects, and things other than the operation of the organization that created them. Informational values in records are used for studies concerning historical events, social developments, or any subject other than the organization itself.
In addition to the values, we look at the level of activity, i.e. are the records of a housekeeping nature, or were they created at the top-levels of the agency? We are not interested in records that show who checked out the department van or who lost their keycard or how much paper was ordered for the copy machine. We are interested in those records that reflect policy formulation and program management. In addition, we look at the significance of the function for which the records were created; the uniqueness of the information; the usability of the information; and, the relationship to other records series within the agency, at other agencies, and those already housed at the Archives.
We also look at what is currently being requested in the research room and what events appear in newspapers and on television. We try to be futurists and anticipate what tomorrow's researchers may need in terms of documentation of our own times.
All of the above actions, referred to as the Art of Appraisal, are used to determine archival value. It’s not a science, and can differ from archivist to archivist depending on the individual’s professional, and personal (to a degree), experience and judgment.